 | Return |
|
|
| ##34 2018-08-28(Tue)16:15:34 (archived 2019-04-17(Wed)06:45:57) |
| _____________________________________________________________________ |
| Is a "secure" Gopher protocol possible? |
| _____________________________________________________________________ |
|
|
| __[2018-08-28(Tue)16:17:04 #290]______________________________________ |
| I mean something along the lines of https where traffic is encrypted. |
|
|
| __[2018-08-28(Tue)22:58:17 #291]______________________________________ |
| Yes, umbrellix.net has examples of what they call s/gopher (gopher + |
| SSL). VF-1 gopher client supports a TLS mode if the server supports |
| it. If you connect to this server on port 105 instead of 70, I am |
| experimenting with SSL too atm |
|
|
| __[2018-08-28(Tue)22:59:18 #292]______________________________________ |
| I put some info on the root menu |
|
|
| __[2018-08-28(Tue)23:02:10 #295]______________________________________ |
| See umbrellix.net for more info on gopher over SSL or the darknet |
|
|
| __[2018-08-28(Tue)23:06:34 #296]______________________________________ |
 | And of course this is cheating, but you can connect here over https |
|
|
| __[2018-11-11(Sun)01:01:44 #349]______________________________________ |
| "Secure" is a good way to describe TLS using CAs. If you want secure |
| and not "secure," you can do gopher as a Tor hidden service. |
|
|